An Investment In Your Employees, Your Company, Your Future
 

OSHA Unveils its Top 10 List

The total number for all 10 citations on the list is 40,463. That's about 4,200 fewer than last year's top 10.

Number 10:
Ladders - 2,054 citations

Comment: Congratulations to Ladders for being the only newcomer to crack the Top 10. All of the other nine standards were repeats from last year.

Number 9:
Electrical, General Requirements - 2,120 citations

Comment: Electrical was in ninth last year, too.

Number 8:
Machine Guarding, General Requirements - 2,743 citations

Comment: This has been a slightly disappointing season for Machine Guarding which was in seventh place last year at this time. The number of violations citing this standard also fell from 3,245 in 2004.

Number 7:
Electrical Wiring Methods, Components, and Equipment for General Use - 2,785 citations

Comment: Wiring fell one place and 552 citations from last year.

Number 6:
Powered Industrial Trucks - 2,871 citations

Comment: A comer, jumping two places from last year.

Number 5:
Lockout/Tagout - 3,711 citations

Comment: This perennial powerhouse dropped one spot from last year.

Number 4:
Respiratory Protection - 3,904 citations

Comment: Finished fifth last year.

Number 3:
Fall Protection, General Requirements - 5,504 citations

Comment: Won the bronze medal last year, too.

Number 2:
Hazard Communication - 6,641 citations

Comment: Always the bridesmaid, never the bride, Haz Com has made a habit of finishing second.

The award for the standard most often cited in OSHA violations goes to:

Number 1:
Scaffolding, General Requirements - 8,130 citations

Comment: Scaffolding has become the New York Yankees of OSHA standards, establishing a three-year dynasty that nobody seems likely to challenge any time soon.

Conclusion

On a serious note, the Scaffolding three-peat is a reflection of three things:

  • The disproportionate number of construction sites included in the OSHA list of priority enforcement targets;
  • The high incidence of fall injuries; and
  • The complexity of the scaffolding standard itself.